“The number of patients with hyperglycaemic crises has increased worldwide,” says Guillermo E. Umpierrez, lead author of a new consensus report that was simultaneously published in Diabetologia and Diabetes Care. In both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, there has been a significant increase in cases of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar state (HHS).
In order to provide up-to-date knowledge on the management of hyperglycaemic crises, the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) – together with the American Diabetes Association (ADA), the Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care ((JBDS-IP), the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology (AACE) and the Diabetes Technology Society (DTS) – convened a panel of experts to update the 2009 ADA consensus statement on hyperglycaemic crises in adults with diabetes. In their collaborative effort, the societies cover a broad range of topics from epidemiology, pathophysiology and clinical presentation to prevention, diagnosis, treatment and future areas of research.
Hyperglycaemic crises on the rise
“DKA and HHS are the most serious, acute and life-threatening hyperglycaemic emergencies in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes,” the consensus authors agree. The global increase in hospitalisations underscores the need for updated guidelines that include recently published data. This urgency is further emphasised by the rising DKA and HHS cases during the COVID-19 pandemic and the evidence regarding an increased risk of DKA associated with SGLT2 inhibitors.
While exact numbers are elusive, recent data suggest that rates of hyperglycaemic crisis range from 44.5 to 82.6 per 1,000 person-years in type 1 diabetes and up to 3.2 per 1000 person-years in type 2 diabetes – the latter being a much lower rate but accounting for most of the admissions. The new guidelines aim to provide healthcare professionals, researchers and people with diabetes with the latest data and recommendations.
Lower glucose threshold to diagnose DKA
The most significant changes to the 2009 ADA consensus include updated diagnostic criteria: The plasma glucose threshold for hyperglycaemia as a criterion for DKA has been lowered from > 13.9 mmol/l or 250 mg/dl to ≥11.1 mmol/l or 200 mg/dl, or even a history of diabetes alone, regardless of glucose levels. This accounts for a wide range of clinical presentations, including euglycaemic DKA.
In addition to hyperglycaemia or diabetes, the diagnosis of DKA is based on the presence of elevated ketones and metabolic acidosis. “All three components must be present to make this diagnosis,” the guidelines state, while “HHS is characterised by severe hyperglycaemia, hyperosmolality, and dehydration in the absence of significant ketosis or acidosis.” This is due to residual insulin secretion in HHS, but not in DKA.
Both DKA and HHS can occur in any type of diabetes and at any age. Typically, DKA is more frequent in younger people with type 1 diabetes, while HHS is more common in older people with type 2 diabetes. Both emergencies are often the result of infections (mainly urinary tract infections and pneumonia) or non-adherence to insulin therapy.
Switching to subcutaneous insulin
For the treatment of DKA, the guidelines recommend the use of either subcutaneous (SC or intravenous (IV insulin, depending on the severity. “Patients with uncomplicated, mild or moderate DKA may be treated with SC rapid-acting insulin analogues,“ the guidelines state, recommending administration every 1–2 hours as an alternative to IV infusion of short-acting insulin. However, this is not the case for severe and complicated DKA or for HHS, where fixed rate IV insulin infusions remain the state of the art. General points to consider during the transition to SC insulin include the risk of hypoglycaemia, nutritional intake, IV dextrose infusion and insulin use (see figure 1 for detailed recommendations).